Logic [ed: Benjamin Martin]

[apurva (Apurva Ashok)]

Thanks for the updates, and for moving over the conversation here so others can join.

For 1, I think we have a good solution in our thread about Logical symbols and accessibility - #14 by christina.hendricks. We will use MathJax to render equations written in LaTeX, and will use Inkscape to create SVG images of diagrams (like the one in your screenshot). The SVG images will be accompanied by alt-text to ensure that they are accessible.

@christina.hendricks

I don’t know how accessible it is to have one ordered list and then a new one starting at a new number after a horizontal line. Will that indicate that the three things are part of one, single argument?

Yes, I think they will, but I would be eager to hear from others who might be more certain.

I’ve pulled an example from the book to demonstrate what this might look like in the Text Editor (Christina, please correct me if this isn’t what you were describing):
<ol>
<li>All tigers are felines.</li>
<li>All lions are felines.</li>
</ol>
<hr/>
<ol start="3">
<li>/[latex]\therefore [/latex]All tigers are lions. </li>
</ol>
And below is what it would display like in the final book formats:

1. All tigers are felines.
2. All lions are felines.

---

3. /∴ All tigers are lions.

@christina.hendricks

I am not sure how best to do this sort of thing so that it is both accessible and renders well in all formats. I doubt a table would work well because the information is not really table-like (I’d have to add row and column headers and that doesn’t really fit here I think). We may just have to move these to be one after the other, vertically.

Avoiding the table format and simply displaying them vertically sounds like a good solution.